- John Ashbrook
But, some will argue, these four spiritual laws are "biblically based" as though the standard for right practice is that the practice has a biblical basis. That's insane. All kinds of nonsense can be justified by that standard. The real question is this; Is our practice doctrinally sound?
By way of contrast, in this post Steve Camp at CAMPONTHIS offers a reconstruction of Four Spiritual Laws that are doctrinally sound and sure to irritate a lot of folks I know.
LAW ONE: God is holy and has a plan for your life whether for wrath or for mercy.
LAW TWO: His wrath burns against you and you are hopelessly lost. There is nothing you can do about it. You are sinful and utterly lost; totally depraved, conceived in sin, and are incapable of saving yourself by the merits of your own righteousness.
LAW THREE: The Lord Jesus Christ came into this world, born of a virgin, tempted as we are yet without sin, died in our place and as our merciful and faithful High Priest fulfilled God’s law, took upon Himself every sin that would ever be committed by every(one) who would ever believe, with its guilt and penalty, and all of the wrath of God that persists against our sin.
LAW FOUR: Repent of your sin and confess and receive Christ Jesus as your Lord and Savior for eternal life and have peace with Him forever. His love, mercy and grace no one can ever take away once your life is hid in Christ. This is God’s wonderful plan of salvation.
Steve Camp
6 comments:
"It produces an easy-believism in which every man is saved but lives just as he did before."
Sigh. Having grown up with the 4 spiritual laws I can definitely attest to the fact that the church is reaping what it has sown. It breaks my heart. They are so blind.
Moses went down to the University of Egypt and told Pharaoh, "God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life. He's going to take your army out and drown it in the Red Sea."
Thanks for posting Steve Camp's reconstruction of the "Four-Spiritual-Laws" as I had not seen it before. Despite any Biblical justification that can be given to the original four-laws, there is a lot wrong with their presentation. Last month I critiqued the Campus Crusade for Christ tract Knowing God Personally, which makes use of those four-laws. See Gospel Review: Knowing God Personally.
Nathan,
Thanks for pointing me in the direction of your critique; I will read that tonight.
I have just recently discovered your blog, CAL.VINI.ST, and enjoy visiting it occasionally for for some good, serious theological discussion by you and Andrew.
@Ralph: Let me know what you think of the critique when you find the time, and glad to know we have you as an occasional reader. Similarly, I have only recently discovered and began following this blog.
God planned you and has a wonderful love for your life.
Post a Comment