Recent polling data indicates that 91% of the American people are against the bail out of the "big three" auto makers. So if that's the case, why do we continue calling this system a "representative government?" When was the last time our elected representatives really represented their constituents?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d13cb/d13cb22bd20651a327b77e818d34d5f9ec47aa56" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d13cb/d13cb22bd20651a327b77e818d34d5f9ec47aa56" alt=""
Our race toward nationalization of industry and banking and real estate seems, to me, to be unconstitutional.
Here are a couple quotes from my favorite president which are relevant in view of our unconstitutional race toward the nationalization of industry, banking, labor, and real estate as a means to fix our economic crises. Congress should pay attention:
"The most terrifying words in the English language are:
I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."
Ronald Reagan
2 comments:
One of my favorite quotes.
One of the first requirements to be elected to any office should be to pass a course in basic economics. Obviously, most our our "representatives" have no clue about economics...or the U.S. Constitution either, for that matter.
Post a Comment